288 results for 'nos:"Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury"'.
J. Reyes tosses a third-amended false advertising complaint concerning at-home ovulation test kits sold at various nationwide retail chains under the Clearblue and First Response brands. The suing customers say the products fail to predict when a consumer is ovulating with 99% accuracy. The court finds a reasonable consumer would exhibit a higher degree of discernment when deciding whether to buy the product and would read the side and back labeling, which clearly state the product does not test for actual ovulation, rather it detects a rise in luteinizing hormone levels, which typically suggests ovulation will occur in the next 24-36 hours.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Reyes, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv5435, NOS: Personal Injury - Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury/Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Consumer Law, Class Action, False Advertising
J. Bryan denies the government's motion to dismiss the family member's complaint that the wife died after being exposed to asbestos fibers while doing laundry for her husband, who was an enlisted navy machinist mate and came into contact with asbestos at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. The government argues that the discretionary function exception applies because it covers certain "governmental decision-making from judicial second guessing of legislative and administrative decisions," but it is uncertain if two of the navy's regulations related to asbestos were mandatory directives that required action and if the government failed to follow those directives.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Bryan, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv5701, NOS: Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Government, Wrongful Death, Asbestos
J. Bell grants a group of medical product makers’ partial motion to dismiss product liability allegations after a spinal surgery patient developed tuberculosis following her operation. The patient claims that the group’s sale of “FiberCel” to the hospital where she had her surgery done is not covered under the North Carolina Blood and Tissue Shield Statute. She incorrectly argues the group’s sale of FiberCel, as a processed-tissue product, is not covered under the statute because it is not specifically blood, a blood product or human tissue, but a “tissue-based product.” Although FiberCel was recalled two months after the patient’s surgery for also resulting in tuberculosis in other patients, the product is shielded by the statute because its language includes any person or institution involved in the “processing” of human tissue.
Court: USDC Western District of North Carolina, Judge: Bell, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 5:21cv172, NOS: Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Government, Health Care, Product Liability
J. Holmes grants in part this motion for attorney fees filed in connection with a motion to compel discovery. The court will award $8,000 in attorney fees as a discovery sanction, as the defendant company's nondisclosure was not "substantially justified."
Court: USDC Middle District of Tennessee , Judge: Holmes, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 3:20cv1103, NOS: Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Sanctions, Discovery, Attorney Fees
J. Vance grants the unopposed request for summary judgment to a Toyota manufacturer and a sales company, dismissing product liability claims by the driver of a 2014 Lexus ES350 who alleges injuries from the car’s airbag failure to deploy when he crashed into a guard rail. The Toyota companies presented certified medical records taken at the hospital where the litigant was treated after the accident, in which the treating physician stated that he reportedly “drank a significant amount of alcohol and then crashed his car on purpose [in] an attempt to end his life secondary to depression and suicidal thoughts after a break-up 5 months ago.” Furthermore, the litigant has failed to present evidence sufficient to establish the essential elements of his defective airbag claims.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Louisiana , Judge: Vance, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv4607, NOS: Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Evidence, Vehicle, Product Liability
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Dimke declines to dismiss the customer's complaint alleging that the vape supplies company manufactured a cigarette battery that spontaneously exploded in his pocket and injured him. The company argues that the complaint is time-barred due to the three-year statute of limitations starting from when he discovered his injury. However, it took the customer a significant amount of time to uncover the previously unknown identity of the company and even the smoke shop that sold the defective cigarette battery admitted that it had trouble finding the identity of its supplier, hence why the customer's discovery was hindered.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Washington, Judge: Dimke, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 4:22cv5014, NOS: Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Product Liability, Discovery
J. Holmes partially grants the individual plaintiff's motion for attorney fees in connection with his motion to compel discovery. The court previously ordered the defendant company to produce certain documents and "to make a corporate representative available" to provide testimony on certain topics. The defendant company now argues that there was a conflict regarding its duties under Italian data privacy laws, but the court concludes that its failure to provide certain documents was not "substantially justified." Not all of the requested fees are reasonable, however, as a discovery sanction.
Court: USDC Middle District of Tennessee , Judge: Holmes, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 3:20cv1103, NOS: Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Sanctions, Discovery, Attorney Fees
J. Aslan grants a motion to enforce the settlement agreement in this subrogation action between an insurer and a company stemming from damage to the insurer’s property allegedly caused by the company’s negligence. The parties agreed to the settlement amount of $240,000, but at the time of the transfer an imposter posing as the insurer’s counsel intercepted the funds. Therefore, the fraudulent actions happened after the contract was in force. The court orders the company to pay the insurer $240,000 and denies the insurer’s request for costs, attorney fees and interest.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Aslan, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv1783, NOS: Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Insurance, Settlements, Contract
J. Brooks denies in part motion to dismiss a family's allegations that a five-year-old died from died from melioidosis, an infectious disease caused by a tropical bacteria called Burkholderia pseudomallei, which they allege he was exposed to by contaminated aromatherapy room spray. The product was purchased at Walmart, and later that year, Walmart recalled the product after finding the bacteria in it. The parents are already litigating a suit against Walmart, and the majority of defendants consent to transfer. Claims against some defendants are severed from claims against other defendants, and the amended complaint shall be given a new case number. This case, with the remaining defendants, shall be transferred to United States District Court for the Central District of California (Eastern Division).
Court: USDC Central District of California, Judge: Brooks, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 5:24cv870, NOS: Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Tort, Wrongful Death
J. Huffaker grants, in part, the medical device maker’s motion to dismiss a product liability suit filed by a patient who claims that her Smart Port, implanted for the purpose of infusion therapy was defective. She alleges claims under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine as well as claims for negligence, breach of warranty and wantonness concerning the device’s catheter, which fractured near her heart. The patient’s claims have an articulated reasonable set of facts that could make the medical device maker’s liable for failure to warn. Therefore, the AEMLD, negligence and wantonness claims may proceed, and the patient concedes her warranty claim.
Court: USDC Middle District of Alabama, Judge: Huffaker, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 2:24cv112, NOS: Personal Injury - Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury/Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Tort, Negligence, Product Liability
J. Conley denies health care providers' motion to dismiss an estate's claims. A man hung himself with a bedsheet and died in his cell, while in the custody of the county jail. The estate filed a lawsuit against the court, jail employees, and healthcare providers who treated the decedent, but later amended the complaint to include additional health care providers. The providers motioned to dismiss the matter claiming the estate did not exercise due diligence in identifying all of the decedent's health care providers, and that it exceeded the statute of limitations when it amended the complaint to name them. It is possible that the amended complaint was timely filed.
Court: USDC Western District of Wisconsin, Judge: Conley, Filed On: April 18, 2024, Case #: 23cv167, NOS: Personal Injury - Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury/Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Health Care, Tort, Negligence
J. Drell grants a request by the seller of a Caterpillar bulldozer to a parish government, dismissing the company from a wrongful death suit filed by the widow and children of the vehicle’s operator. The operator’s family has no reasonable possibility of recovery under state law, and they have not shown the company was a professional vendor with control over the design or construction of the bulldozer. Furthermore, because a warning to wear a seatbelt was posted on the machine within the operator’s view, the seller did not have a duty to verbally warn parish employees that operating the bulldozer without wearing the seatbelt could be dangerous.
Court: USDC Western District of Louisiana , Judge: Drell, Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv672, NOS: Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Employment, Product Liability, Wrongful Death
J. Stadtmueller grants a patient’s motion to compel discovery. The patient has opioid disorder and insomnia, and was under care when he was arrested for driving while intoxicated. While detained in the county jail, he received none of his medications, as according to jail medical staff, methadone is not prescribed for inmates under any circumstances, and he was not permitted to leave the jail to receive treatment at a methadone clinic. The patient claims denial of treatment resulted in him experiencing extreme withdrawal. The patient requested discovery that the county objected to on grounds that it violated the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and that the requests were overly vague. But the instant court finds the discovery request relevant to the patient’s case and does not immediately see issues with HIPAA.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Wisconsin, Judge: Stadtmueller, Filed On: April 16, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv873, NOS: Personal Injury - Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury/Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Civil Procedure, Health Care, Discovery
J. Pepper grants a manufacturer’s motion to enforce the court’s discovery order and for sanctions against an individual. The individual filed suit against a manufacturer claiming he was injured when a chair the company made collapsed, resulting in quadriplegia. The court ordered the individual to respond to the manufacturer’s discovery requests, but he has not fully complied. The court grants the manufacturer’s motion to compel discovery and orders the individual to produce the requested documents by a certain deadline or face additional sanctions.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Wisconsin, Judge: Pepper, Filed On: April 16, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv586, NOS: Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Sanctions, Product Liability, Discovery
J. Devers dismisses a motorcycle dealer as a party to this suit and affirms the other parties’ claim that the dealer was fraudulently added. A couple bought a motorcycle elsewhere and noticed it was leaking oil, then took it to the dealer for repair. After a successful repair, the couple crashed when part of the braking system failed, killing the wife and causing serious injury to the husband. The other parties argue the husband and his wife’s executrix added the dealer to foil diversity jurisdiction because they could not claim negligence against the dealer. They then tried to remand the suit, but as they are found to have fraudulently added the dealer, and because diversity jurisdiction still exists, the dealer is dismissed and the motion to remand is denied.
Court: USDC Eastern District of North Carolina, Judge: Dever, Filed On: April 15, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv591, NOS: Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Fraud, Product Liability, Jurisdiction
J. Birzer grants a patient's motion to leave to file an amended complaint concerning strict products liability claims against a pharmaceutical company. The patient, who suffers from alopecia after taking a breast cancer chemotherapy drug, sufficiently showed in court that the manufacturer created an "informational tear sheet" distributed to chemotherapy nursing staff, falsely claiming that hair loss was temporary.
Court: USDC Kansas, Judge: Birzer, Filed On: April 12, 2024, Case #: 6:23cv1228, NOS: Personal Injury - Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury/Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Health Care, Negligence, Product Liability
J. Joseph denies a request by the distributor of a digital test gauge to dismiss as time-barred a product liability claim by the widow of an offshore oilfield worker. She alleges the poor design and inadequate warnings about the use of the pressure-gauge resulted in the deadly explosion at an offshore well that claimed her husband and the father of their two young children. The decedent’s employer, as the owner of the offshore platform, and the distributor of the pressure gauge are both liable even when no act on the employer’s part may have caused the accident. Prescription was interrupted by the survivors' earlier wrongful death suit against the employer in Texas.
Court: USDC Western District of Louisiana , Judge: Joseph, Filed On: April 12, 2024, Case #: 6:23cv415, NOS: Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Civil Procedure, Product Liability, Jurisdiction
J. Sessions denies Monsanto, Bayer and two other companies’ motion to dismiss a misrepresentation claim brought by four teachers and a student, who say the companies’ polychlorinated biphenyls are contaminating school buildings, as well as a husband’s claim for loss of consortium due to his wife’s injuries. The ag giants are not entitled to dismissal because the plaintiffs plausibly alleged justifiable reliance on the companies’ representations.
Court: USDC Vermont, Judge: Sessions, Filed On: April 12, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv272, NOS: Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Environment, Tort, Negligence
J. Kennelly grants a baby formula manufacturer’s motion to dismiss an unjust enrichment class action brought by a nationwide class of consumers. The consumers paid more for baby formula after the manufacturer instituted a mass voluntary recall of tainted formula and shut down the facility where the formula was produced. Despite this, the court finds the class has failed to state a claim, opining there is no law under which the manufacturer “was obligated to maintain particular levels of formula production and supply or otherwise ensure stable formula prices.”
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Kennelly, Filed On: April 12, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv4148, NOS: Personal Injury - Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury/Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Product Liability, Business Practices, Class Action